<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Changing Bird Names for Inclusivity	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.vinsweb.org/changing-bird-names-for-inclusivity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.vinsweb.org/changing-bird-names-for-inclusivity/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=changing-bird-names-for-inclusivity</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 13:06:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Katharine Britton		</title>
		<link>https://blog.vinsweb.org/changing-bird-names-for-inclusivity/#comment-281</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katharine Britton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 13:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.vinsweb.org/?p=1018799#comment-281</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting, informative, and beautifully written.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, informative, and beautifully written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jon Bouton		</title>
		<link>https://blog.vinsweb.org/changing-bird-names-for-inclusivity/#comment-278</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Bouton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2020 18:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.vinsweb.org/?p=1018799#comment-278</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As someone casually trying to learn birds, the idea of learning new names for birds I’ve started to know is a step backwards and discouraging. However, giving them common names with descriptive features or habitats would give more context and make learning could make learning easier. This could also link important birds with the habitats that support them, thereby drawing attention to those vital habitats and their ecological function. So, I support changing the names.

Which leads to the question, “Should scientific names be changed for the same reason?”]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone casually trying to learn birds, the idea of learning new names for birds I’ve started to know is a step backwards and discouraging. However, giving them common names with descriptive features or habitats would give more context and make learning could make learning easier. This could also link important birds with the habitats that support them, thereby drawing attention to those vital habitats and their ecological function. So, I support changing the names.</p>
<p>Which leads to the question, “Should scientific names be changed for the same reason?”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: blog.vinsweb.org @ 2026-06-14 09:02:28 by W3 Total Cache
-->